AI-Powered Risk Intelligence Platform

AI-Powered Cyber Risk Management

Cut risk documentation time by 70%. Never miss a threat again. From Terraform to threat model in 30 seconds.

3 min
per risk record
(vs. 4–6 hours)
90%+
STRIDE threat
coverage
6
compliance
frameworks
8–12 hrs
saved per analyst
per week
Platform

Everything Your Security Team Needs

A unified platform that replaces spreadsheets and ad-hoc processes with structured, AI-augmented workflows — producing consistent, auditable, board-ready risk records.

AI Engine

AI-powered threat enumeration, executive summaries, and risk scoring — in under 3 seconds.

Threat Modeling

STRIDE analysis with auto-generated Data Flow Diagrams from Terraform, YAML, or plain text in seconds.

Attack Trees

Visual AI-populated attack trees with probability scoring and MITRE ATT&CK technique mapping.

Risk Management

Configurable risk matrix, inherent vs. residual scoring, ownership tracking, and full immutable audit trails.

Compliance

Multi-framework posture tracking with evidence management, control mapping, and audit-ready reports.

Asset Registry

Full inventory with CIA ratings, data classification, exposure type, and AI-generated risk summaries.

Dashboard & KPIs

Executive risk heatmaps, residual score trends, and shareable customisable dashboards.

Guided Wizard

Step-by-step workflows let junior analysts document risks independently within 2–3 days of onboarding.

How It Works

From Zero to Board-Ready
in Three Steps

Citadel replaces weeks of manual spreadsheet work with a guided, AI-augmented workflow any analyst can follow from day one.

1

Register Your Assets

Connect your Terraform, Kubernetes, or CloudFormation code — or describe your asset in plain text. Citadel automatically discovers components, data flows, and exposure types.

IaC Import Manual Entry CIA Ratings
2

AI Analyses Every Threat

In under 3 seconds, Citadel's AI engine runs full STRIDE and PASTA analysis, generates a Data Flow Diagram, maps MITRE ATT&CK techniques, and writes an executive summary — automatically.

STRIDE / PASTA Auto-DFD MITRE ATT&CK
3

Track, Report & Comply

Risks flow into the live register with ownership, scoring, and remediation tracking. Compliance posture updates in real time. One click exports a board-ready PDF or auditor package.

Risk Register Live Compliance Audit Export
2–3 Days
analyst onboarding
vs. 4–6 weeks manually
< 3 Seconds
full threat analysis
per asset, end-to-end
Always Audit-Ready
immutable evidence trail
across all 6 frameworks
Product Modules

Every Module. Purpose-Built.

Citadel ships four core AI modules that work together across your entire risk workflow — from first draft to final audit.

app.citadel.antumsecure.com / risks / new
RisksRisk Composer
Draft auto-saved
JM
Risk Composer
Auto-save ON
Risk
2 Assets
3 Threats
4 Vulns
5 Controls
6 Summary
Risk Data Breach via SQL Injection — Payment Gateway API

Select assets affected by this risk

Payment Gateway API Selected
Application AWS · us-east-1 Confidential — PCI scope
C:5
I:5
A:4
· Exposure: Internet-facing
PostgreSQL — AppDB
Database · AWS RDS · Internal
S3 — prod-app-assets
Storage · AWS S3 · Internet-facing
Citadel AI Active
Inherent Score
20 / 25 · Critical
Likelihood × Impact
4
Likelihood
5
Impact
AI Suggestions
Based on this asset's exposure and classification, 14 threats will be auto-generated in Step 3.

6-step guided wizard — AI auto-generates threats, scores, and descriptions the moment you link an asset.

app.citadel.antumsecure.com / risks
DashboardRisk Register
JM
47
Total Risks
7
Critical
18
High
22
Mitigated
RISK NAME ASSET SCORE STATUS OWNER LIKELIHOOD IMPACT
SQL Injection via Payment API
ID: #1042
Payment Gateway API
20
In Review
JM
High (4) Critical (5)
Hardcoded JWT Secret in Env Vars
ID: #1041
Payment Gateway API
20
Open
SC
High (4) Critical (5)
Over-Privileged IAM Lambda Role
ID: #1038
S3 — prod-app-assets
15
In Review
AP
High (4) High (4)
PII Leaked in API Error Responses
ID: #1035
Payment Gateway API
12
Mitigated
SC
Med (3) High (4)
No Rate Limiting on /api/v2/charge
ID: #1031
Payment Gateway API
9
Accepted
JM
Med (3) Med (3)
Showing 5 of 47 risks  ·  View all →

The Risk Register gives your team a single source of truth — score, status, ownership, and mitigation in one view.

app.citadel.antumsecure.com / mitigations
DashboardMitigation Plans
JM
34
Total Plans
14
Completed
41% completion rate
13
In Progress
7
Overdue
Active Mitigation Plans
PLAN NAME LINKED RISK EFFECTIVENESS STATUS OWNER DUE DATE RESIDUAL ↓
Parameterised Query Refactor
MP-2024-001
#1042 SQL Injection
High
In Progress
SC
10 Jun 2026 ↓ 95%
JWT Secret Rotation to AWS Secrets Manager
MP-2024-002
#1041 Hardcoded JWT
High
Not Started
JM
03 Jun 2026 ! ↓ 85%
IAM Least-Privilege Policy Review
MP-2024-003
#1038 IAM Over-Priv
Med
In Progress
AP
20 Jun 2026 ↓ 60%
Error Response Sanitisation
MP-2024-004
#1035 PII Leak
High
Completed
SC
22 May 2026 ↓ 100%

Each mitigation plan links directly to its risk, tracks effectiveness, and updates the residual score automatically when marked complete.

app.citadel.antumsecure.com / risks / 1042
RisksSQL Injection via Payment API
JM
SQL Injection via Payment API
Payment Gateway API · Application Security · J. Moreau · Created 02 May 2026
In Review Critical
Inherent Score
20
Likelihood 4 × Impact 5
Residual Score
12
With active controls
Risk Tolerance
8
Above appetite !
AI Risk Review
2.8s · 28 May 2026

This risk presents a Critical inherent score driven by an unmitigated SQL injection in the transaction endpoint. PCI-DSS cardholder data is in scope. 3 of 4 priority controls pending — residual will drop to 8 on completion. Immediate action required on P1 and P2.

AI-Generated

The Payment Gateway API accepts user-supplied input in the transaction_id and account_ref parameters without adequate parameterisation. An attacker could craft malicious SQL payloads to read, modify, or delete records in the PostgreSQL backend, potentially exposing PCI-scoped cardholder data.

2 Critical threats with no mitigations applied — immediate remediation required before next audit
PCI-DSS Req 6.2 and 6.3 currently non-compliant — QSA assessment at risk
Threat T04 (PII disclosure) successfully mitigated by S. Chen on 22 May 2026
DoS risk accepted by J. Moreau on 14 May 2026 — review due in 90 days

The AI Risk Review runs on a configurable schedule and writes a versioned, immutable summary to the audit trail every time.

AI Risk Composer

From raw data to reviewed risks in a single workflow

Citadel pulls context from your connected assets, feeds it through the AI engine, and surfaces ranked, ready-to-create risks — in seconds.

1
Data Sources
Connected integrations
Ingesting asset context…
2
Citadel AI Engine
Risk generation & scoring
Risks generated
3
AI-Generated Risks
Review, refine, create
Awaiting AI output…
or click the phase buttons above
Auto-ingested context
Asset CIA scores, exposure level, and classification — alongside IaC, DFDs, attack trees, and your existing threat and risk data — are ingested automatically. No manual re-entry.
Refine before saving
Edit AI-proposed names, adjust scores, or prompt for a re-score — then accept with one click.
Instant risk register
Selected risks are created, scored, and assigned in a single action — auto-linked to the source asset.
AI Engine

Intelligence at
Every Step

Every workflow in Citadel is AI-augmented. From the moment you register an asset, the engine is generating threat scenarios, mapping controls, and writing board-ready summaries — in under 3 seconds.

One-Click Threat Enumeration
AI generates complete STRIDE and PASTA threat scenarios based on asset context, sector, and exposure. No manual lookup required — 90%+ coverage guaranteed.
Executive Risk Summaries
Auto-generated board-ready paragraphs for every asset and risk, cached and versioned. Directors get the context they need without chasing analysts.
Mitigation Recommendations
Industry-standard controls mapped to each threat, prioritised by cost-effectiveness and residual risk reduction potential.
Risk Score Enrichment
Combines likelihood, impact, threat intelligence, and active controls into a transparent, explainable residual risk score.
AI Analysis — Payment API Asset
Complete
Threat scenarios generated 14 threats
STRIDE categories covered 6 / 6
Controls recommended 22 controls
Executive summary drafted 2.1 s
Total AI response time 2.8 seconds
70%
less documentation time
<3s
avg AI response
90%+
STRIDE coverage
Analyst Productivity
Onboarding time 4–6 weeks → 2–3 days
Hours saved / analyst / week 8–12 hours
Threat Modeling & Auto-DFD

Continuous Threat Modeling
from Your Infrastructure Code

Citadel integrates directly with your IaC and FaC pipelines — Terraform, CloudFormation, Kubernetes, Bicep, and more. Every infrastructure change triggers a fresh STRIDE analysis and an updated Data Flow Diagram, automatically. Confluence pages and Jira tickets are pulled in as context to make threat models specific to each asset.

infrastructure/main.tf Terraform HCL
resource "aws_instance" "web_server" {
  ami           = "ami-0c55b159cbfafe1f0"
  instance_type = "t3.medium"

  vpc_security_group_ids = [
    aws_security_group.web.id
  ]
  subnet_id = aws_subnet.public.id

  tags = { Name = "WebServer", Env = "Prod" }
}

resource "aws_db_instance" "database" {
  engine         = "postgres"
  instance_class = "db.t3.small"
  db_name        = "appdb"
  multi_az       = true
  storage_encrypted = true
}

resource "aws_s3_bucket" "assets" {
  bucket = "prod-app-assets"
  tags   = { Classification = "Confidential" }
}
Terraform HCL Kubernetes YAML CloudFormation Bicep / ARM Firewall as Code
AI Analysis
~30 seconds
DFD + STRIDE Threat Register Generated
%% Mermaid DFD (interactive, zoomable)
Internet ──▶ [WebServer : T3]
[WebServer : T3] ──▶ [RDS : Postgres]
[WebServer : T3] ──▶ [S3 : assets]
✓ 3 components · 5 data flows · exported SVG
S Spoofing — unauthenticated access on WebServer API endpoint
T Tampering — SQL injection via unsanitised input to RDS
I Info Disclosure — S3 bucket misconfigured with public-read ACL
D DoS — no rate limiting on web tier ingress
E Elevation — over-privileged IAM role on EC2 instance profile
+ 9 more threats  ·  promote all to Risk Register with 1 click

Full STRIDE coverage — all 6 categories analysed systematically (vs. 40–60% coverage from memory)

S
Spoofing
T
Tampering
R
Repudiation
I
Info Disclosure
D
Denial of Service
E
Elevation of Privilege
Continuous Modeling
IaC and FaC changes trigger automatic re-analysis — threats never go stale
Confluence & Jira Context
Architecture docs, runbooks, and Jira tickets are used to ground threats to your specific environment
Versioned Models
Full diff view as your architecture evolves — see exactly what changed and what new threats emerged
One-Click Promotion
Threats promote directly to the risk register with full IaC context intact
Integrations

Connects to Your Existing Stack

Citadel plugs directly into your IaC pipelines, vulnerability scanners, and issue trackers. No rip-and-replace. Plug in and go.

Infrastructure as Code
Auto-discover assets from state & templates
Terraform Cloud
Remote state · asset discovery
Terraform Enterprise
On-premises state management
AWS CloudFormation
Stack templates · change sets
Azure Bicep / ARM
Resource templates · deployments
Firewall as Code
Version-controlled firewall policy automation
Palo Alto Panorama
Centralised policy & rule management
Fortinet FortiGate
FortiManager API · Ansible provider
AWS Network Firewall
WAF rules · Security Groups as code
Cisco Firepower / FMC
FMC REST API · policy deployment
OPA / Ansible
Policy as Code · network playbooks
Vulnerability Scanners
Import CVEs and scan results
Tenable.io
Cloud vulnerability management
Tenable.sc
Nessus professional manager
Qualys
Cloud vulnerability scanning
Rapid7 InsightVM
Vulnerability management
Nessus Professional
Local vulnerability scanning
Issue Trackers & ITSM
Bi-directional ticket sync
Jira Cloud
Vulnerabilities · mitigations · custom fields
ServiceNow
Incident & change management
Confluence
Wiki & documentation sync
Compliance

Multi-Framework Compliance,
All in One Place

Map your controls once, comply with multiple frameworks simultaneously. Evidence management, assessment tracking, and posture scoring — always audit-ready.

NIST SP 800-53 ISO/IEC 27001 PCI-DSS SOC 2 CIS Controls + Custom Frameworks

Evidence Management

Upload PDFs, images, and documents as compliance evidence. URL references and text notes supported. Full audit trail with uploader identity and timestamp — ready for external auditors.

PDF / DOCX Images URLs Notes

Control Mapping

Link your existing controls to framework controls with coverage percentages. Map once to NIST — see your ISO 27001 and PCI-DSS gaps automatically. 20+ NIST control families supported.

20+ control families Gap analysis Coverage %

Posture Scoring

Weighted compliance scores per framework, per asset, and organisation-wide. Real-time posture from assessment status: Compliant, Partial, Non-Compliant, N/A.

Per-asset scores Org-wide posture Trends
Dashboard & Reporting

Executive visibility, real-time

From analyst workbench to boardroom slide — Citadel surfaces the right risk data at every level, live.

app.citadel.antumsecure.com / dashboard / executive
Live
Dashboard Executive View
JM
Risks by Severity 47 total
47 risks
Critical7
High18
Medium14
Low8
Residual Risk Trend ↓ 23% QoQ
Live Activity Streaming
Top Open Risks View all →
SQL Injection — Payment API
#1042 · J. Moreau
Critical 20 In Review
Hardcoded JWT Secret
#1041 · S. Chen
Critical 20 Open
Over-Privileged IAM Role
#1038 · A. Patel
High 15 In Review
Unencrypted S3 Bucket
#1036 · A. Patel
High 12 Open
Mitigation Velocity Last 6 months
Risk Heat Matrix
Likelihood (x-axis) × Impact (y-axis) — hover a dot to inspect
Critical High Medium
54321
H
L1L2L3L4L5 →
← Likelihood
Plotted Risks
SQL Injection
Score 20
Hardcoded JWT
Score 20
IAM Over-Priv
Score 15
PII in Errors
Score 12
No Rate Limit
Score 9
Residual Risk Score — 12-Month Trend
Average residual score across all active risks
↓ 23% this quarter
Risk appetite threshold = 10 Now below threshold
Risks Closed
+22
this quarter vs 14 last quarter
Avg. Time to Mitigate
18d
↓ from 31 days last quarter
Risk Appetite Status
Within Appetite
Avg. residual 8.4 vs threshold 10
Framework Coverage
Controls mapped & verified
Recent Audit Events
Next Audit Readiness
PCI-DSS QSA14 days
ISO 27001 Surveillance62 days
Risk Heat Matrix
Every risk plotted by likelihood × impact across your full asset portfolio.
Residual Trends
Prove programme effectiveness to the board with 12-month residual score history.
Compliance Coverage
PCI-DSS, ISO 27001, SOC 2, NIST — gaps, mapping status, and audit-readiness at a glance.
Shareable Reports
One-click PDF export or live share links with granular view/edit permissions.
Contact

Ready to Secure
Your Organisation?

Tell us about your security requirements and we'll get back to you.

Or email us directly at info@antumsecure.com